“Dry Fire Practice: Helpful or Hindrance…?”

I’ve got an excellent Armed American Report for you. Last week, I posed a member-question to you all, about dry fire practice, and I received some excellent responses. That gave me the idea to catalog them all onto a web-page, which I have included at the tail end in the “Ask Tim” section.

Also- last week, I told you that I was going to sit down and really go through the “SurviveInPlace” courses that I’ve been telling you about. You know- that program Dave Morris is putting on.

Okay… I have to admit that I still am not all the way through it, but guys… this is really good stuff. I mean… really good.

I’ve blown money on some stuff that I never use before (namely, about fifty different holsters), and so for what this course cost me, I really didn’t expect much. I definitely didn’t expect to get blown away.

In one of the week’s lessons for example, Dave gives some insider info about cellular networks that I had seriously never thought of. It’s pretty obvious to me that if a disaster knocked out the cell towers, our phones wouldn’t work- but I had never considered some of the potential problems Dave points out if towers actually remain active. His solution is fantastic though.

You guys know that I don’t recommend other people’s stuff very often. But… from what I’ve seen so far, I definitely wouldn’t feel right if I didn’t at least tell you guys that this is the kind of stuff that I want everyone who lives near me to read, be aware of, and prepare for.

Supporting one family in a disaster will be enough… I want people to be prepared.

So yeah… check it out. If you’re interested, here’s the link:

Dave’s Urban Survival Secrets: SurviveInPlace

Okay, hold on tight, because here we go!


== USCCA Laugh of the Week ==

See all of Chaim’s Cartoons at his website:
http://www.chaimcartoons.com/


“Defensive Shooting & Handicaps”

“…Can a man with only one hand with only two fingers and a thumb
on that hand be able to use a handgun for self-defense?…”

by Cody S. Alderson

At a combat shooting course I participated in many years ago, there was an attorney that was in charge of the qualifying test at the indoor range. Part of the qualifying at that time was to kneel and put hits on target. Some of the guys put a hand on the floor to help themselves up after firing from a kneeling position which upset the attorney to the point where he started yelling.

He was ranting about how much time would be lost in using a hand to help yourself up, and how it shouldn’t be necessary for anyone to do that. I was a young fellow at the time, but not everyone there was. I understand the position that the attorney was taking as the instructor who would passing or failing the students, but it got me thinking about defensive shooters with handicaps.

That attorney all those years ago is correct in that we should all do our best to be physically fit, but in the real world we human beings come in all sizes and shapes with varying levels of physical abilities. I’ve heard well respected instructors who teach defensive shooting actually make remarks that could easily be interpreted as rude and disrespectful, especially to fat guys like me.

I certainly hope that the comments were made out of a desire to motivate me toward more exercise and healthier living, but I must also say that such an approach just doesn’t work with civilians. Maybe it works in the military where the recruit is Government Issue, and is at the mercy of his or her superiors, but I don’t see it having much of a positive effect on the office worker who might enjoy M&M’s for a snack instead of carrot sticks.

Does that mean that fat folks or people with handicaps shouldn’t be allowed to have a gun for self-defense? I don’t think anyone in the gun community would even entertain such a thought. All citizens are under the guarantee of non-infringement that the Second Amendment promises. Criminals and the mentally incompetent don’t count under that guarantee because we, as a society, have adjudicated them to have restricted rights to protect themselves and/or other members of society.

I meet all kinds of people who ask me about owning a gun and learning how to use it. I never pass judgment on an adult person’s physical ability to use a gun for self-defense, and will try to work out a way for the person to become competent with a gun no matter what the physical handicap is. Admittedly there are some handicaps that make me currently incapable of offering any advice or instruction on how to competently use a gun, but there are many handicaps that are easy to work around.

An old man with a cane who can only get back up after falling by using something to grab onto is still a very viable candidate to be a competent civilian defensive operator. He just needs to train harder to stay upright while under attack and train to be able to fight with the gun while on the ground. If a thug whacks the old man with a bat and is preparing to wield a killing blow after the old man is on the ground, then grandpa needs to be able to get his gun out while on the ground and put holes in his attacker while on his back. If he stops his attacker with a couple of well-placed rounds from a .380 or a .45, then the police can help him up when they get there.

Okay, so that scenario could obviously go many different ways. Don’t be over thinking the specific scenario right now. Rather, think of what even a severely handicapped person CAN DO instead of what he CAN’T DO. I’ve worked for several years with the developmentally disabled. I try to get them to DO things instead of DOING things for them. Of course they will not ever be gun owners because of the mental incompetency factor, but the ideology translates well over into the world of physical handicaps and defensive shooting.

If I saw a highly trained S.W.A.T officer having to use a hand on the ground just to be able to get up from being on his knees, I might think that he needs to either see a doctor about the knees or back issue, or maybe spend some time in the gym doing squats. If I see a fat guy like me at the gun range wearing a Hawaiian shirt, shooting from a kneeling position, and needing to use his hand for a bit of oomph to get up, it isn’t a big deal at all.

Of course, both I and the dude in the Hawaiian shirt would be better at defending ourselves if we got in better shape. I’d be better at a lot of different things if I took more time with the subjects or issues. We read about incidents of crime every single day in the newspapers, and we hear about them constantly on TV. Still, I may live out my whole life and never need to draw my gun.

That being said, I want to promote a teaching ideology to all instructors. Don’t scare away good citizens who need some encouragement as well as fundamentals to become competent concealed carry permit holders because you want all of your students to be trained like they are Special Forces Operatives. Instead, tailor the instruction to the student and encourage those who want to progress more by taking them to each successive level at their own pace.

I would like to see a few courses being promoted as specifically for those with health issues, and those with physical issues that need instruction adapted to their needs. Grandma with arthritis might not be able to handle the 1911, but she may be able to work a 20 Gauge with a vertical foregrip. Just an example to get the creative juices flowing.

Instructors should take a course at a community college about being an educator to students with physical handicaps. Or one could volunteer some time to assist those with handicaps to learn how they adapt products and methods to suit their own needs. So much insight could be gained by just observation.

Can a man with only one hand with only two fingers and a thumb on that hand be able to use a handgun for self-defense? If you are an instructor, then work out the answer in your head and with an unloaded gun. You might be surprised at the answer. What about a man who is blind in one eye? I have a friend who is blind in one eye. He drives and really likes to shoot Glocks.

I actually though that driving would be way more difficult than shooting, due to depth perception issues. He has been blind in the one eye since birth so his brain wired itself a bit differently to compensate for the missing visual input. Someone that would suddenly lose sight in one eye as an adult would have a more difficult time learning to adapt, but it is by no means impossible.

Carrying a gun for self-defense need not be a tedious thing that we dread doing. Some instructors teach defensive shooting like it is a religion, and only their faithful end up sticking around to learn more. Then there is the opposite end of the spectrum, where training is too casual without any emphasis being put on the need for the student to take the instruction seriously to become competent. As it is in most things, there is a balance that can be reached.

I’m not a member of any S.W.A.T. Team. I’m just a guy who carries a permit and a gun in case someone is trying to maim or kill me. With it, I can at least have a hope of fighting back to save my life. I like potato chips, pasta, and fresh baked bread, but I can still run up a flight of stairs without dropping over dead. Now I’m not fit to take on Tito Ortiz or Mike Tyson with my bare hands and hope to win, but if a sociopath built like Tito or Mike suddenly wants to kill me, I bet my competency with my handgun would do okay at stopping him. And I’m glad I pursued becoming competent with a gun even though the attorney from that course so long ago made me wonder if I had what it takes to even begin to think I could defend myself.


Review of Evapo-Rust Rust Remover

written by Cody S. Alderson

USCCA GEAR REVIEW

Growing up, I got rid of rust with sandpaper and steel wool. I bought a jar of Naval Jelly once. I wasn’t impressed. I even had this attachment for my electric drill that had these stiff metal wires sticking out of a disk that was supposed to strip rust or paint. I ended up messing up some items made out of wood using the tool, and I have no idea what happened to it after that.

When it comes to a firearm that has come down with a bad case of rust, I personally wouldn’t want to be opting for the mechanical method of removing the rust if I didn’t have to. I’d prefer to have a chemical product available to me that would remove the rust and leave the good metal alone. Bruce Bannon, a reader of the Armed American Report told me about Evapo-Rust. He asked me if I had ever heard of the stuff, and what I thought about it.

I had never heard of Evapo-Rust but was curious about the claims of the product after visiting the website. The product is touted as being non-toxic either orally or on the skin, non-flammable, non-corrosive, not a skin irritant, not a primary eye irritant, no acids, no caustics, no volatile organic compounds, no solvents, and is biodegradable just to name a few of its features.

I just had to get me some of this miracle liquid to try out under conditions that could easily be duplicated by any consumer at home. I’ve heard incredible product claims before only to be sorely disappointed by a product’s performance away from the controlled environment of the TV cameras or print ads. Some things perform flawlessly on TV and in the before and after photos of the print ads, but when taken out of the package at home, they perform in an entirely different manner.

I began my research as to how Evapo-Rust is supposed to do its work. It works by chelation (pronounced key-lay-shun) or more simply, grabbing onto the rust and removing it from the metal without changing the metal under the rust. Evapo-Rust grabs onto the iron oxide, but it does not grab onto the iron in the metal underneath the rust because the bonds are much stronger.

The liquid Evapo-Rust is pale yellow in color. Quite frankly, it looks like pee. Thankfully it doesn’t smell like pee! In fact, I couldn’t detect any odor coming from the raw product. The active component of the product remains active until it cannot hold any more iron oxides. If the liquid evaporates while soaking a rusty item, just add fresh water back to replace what has evaporated.

The waste material after the product is spent is only as toxic as the materials introduced into it when soaking whatever rusty metal I put in it. The product is non-toxic from the bottle, but whatever is soaked in it will transfer into the liquid.

Evapo-Rust is designed to be a selectively chelate oxides, and will leave brass, aluminum, copper, chrome solder points, titanium, steel, gold, lead, vinyl, plastic, rubber, cork, silicone, glass, and wood alone. It will remove finishes on firearms such as bluing, browning, Parkerizing, and zinc phosphate, but will leave other coatings alone as long as they are still adhering to the surface and do not contain oxides.

I thought that I would need a lot of Evapo-Rust to even get little jobs done since whatever I’m trying to remove the rust from needs to be immersed in the product. I learned from Orison, the company behind Evapo-Rust, that being a bit innovative can make a small amount of the product go a long way. One suggestion from them was to use a piece of one inch PVC tubing to soak a gun barrel in if I wanted to remove rust from both the exterior and interior of the barrel (remember though, Evapo-Rust will remove finishes like bluing). PVC tubing with one end plugged makes a perfect little container to hold most barrels with only a small amount of Evapo-Rust being required to get full immersion.

For getting rust out of just the inside of a barrel I would only need to plug one end of the barrel, put some Evapo-Rust in it, and swish it back and forth until the rust was gone. Be careful not to get any of the product on the exterior of the barrel especially if it is blued. After de-rusting the inside of a barrel, it needs to be cleaned out with patches until one comes out clean, then it needs to have a rust preventative applied.

Evapo-Rust will act as a short-term rust inhibitor if the product is reapplied after rust removal and washing of the item, but I would pick a longer lasting rust inhibitor to do the job. For guns, that would simply be your favorite gun oil. After Evapo-Rust gets rid of the rust on the metal one is treating, the metal should be cleaned. Sometimes a bit of carbon is left behind after using the product that can easily be wiped away with a cloth.

Now for you home brew types who are old timers that get nervous about new products, I want you to know that I’m familiar with the use of molasses to remove rust using the same chelation process as Evapo-Rust. After all, if molasses works as good as Evapo-Rust, then why not just use some molasses from the kitchen?

Well that’s what I was wondering too, so I mixed up a batch of water and molasses at a nine to one ratio. Nine parts water to one part House of Herbs Blackstrap Molasses. I couldn’t find any sulphured molasses made from green cane anywhere I looked. Why might that be important? Sulphur is an important component in the chelation process. Look at is as the component that has the ability of making what is doing the chelation let go of the iron oxide so it can go back and grab some more rust off of the metal surface.

I also used some of the blackstrap molasses on its own to see if it had any rust removing properties when not mixed with water. I ended up with an experiment using six rusty nails, and two rusty carriage bolts with nuts as seen in the photo below.

I submerged two nails and one carriage bolt with nut attached in the Evapo-Rust, and did the same for the molasses and water solution. I also submerged two rusty nails in the blackstrap molasses that wasn’t mixed with anything else. I removed the nails and carriage bolts and nuts twelve hours and forty minutes later. Most rust removal projects take about thirty minutes with Evapo-Rust unless the metal is badly rusted, but I wanted to give time for the molasses to work. Below are photo results of the rusty parts after their bath, and washing to remove residual product they were submerged in.

Molasses Only

Molasses and Water in a Nine To One Ratio

Evapo-Rust

Clearly the Evapo-Rust is the winner as being the most effective rust remover. The results are clearly remarkable. The molasses and water don’t seem to have done anything, and neither did the molasses by itself. Any rust that appears to have been removed from those test pieces probably came off when I scrubbed them under clear running water in the sink.

The Evapo-Rust crept into the area where the nut was threaded onto the carriage bolt as well. The tiny area of rust that can still be seen on the bolt is where the nut was threaded on. The encrusted rust is gone, but a little oxide is left. I left the nuts on the carriage bolt to see if the molasses solution or Evapo-Rust would do anything where the threads met. The encrusted rust on the test sample soaked in molasses and water still is encrusted with rust. The Evapo-Rust test sample only has a bit of rust where the nut was threaded on the bolt. Quite impressive results.

Evapo-Rust at $21.00 per gallon is pricier than mixing up a nine to one ration of molasses and water, but obviously only one of the products works as a rust remover. For my home rust removing projects a quart will do just fine. If I needed to soak whole engine blocks or a bathtub full of old guns, I could buy 55 gallon drums of Evapo-Rust.

The bottom line is, if I’m baking up something sweet that can benefit from the unique taste of molasses to improve the flavor I will use molasses. If I’m making a homemade barbecue sauce I will use some molasses as one of the ingredients. If I’m trying to get rust off of steel, I will be using Evapo-Rust to safely and effectively get the job done. Evapo-Rust is superior to any product or method I have ever tried for removing rust from steel.

Orison will be sending Bruce Bannon a gallon of Evapo-Rust since he was the one who made me aware of this great product. I really appreciated that kind gesture from Orison. They didn’t have to do that, but they did anyway. I’m sure that Bruce will be thrilled with how the product performs. I was.

Check out this great product as well as other products from Orison at www.orisonmarketing.com.

I would like to hear from you.
Email me at: cody@uscca.us.
Twitter me.


Dear Tim,

I am not writing to ask a question, I am writing to say thanks for the Beat the Ban. I thought I was ahead of the curve, but only realized I had been putting off buying what I may need and what I really wanted before the Obamanation takes place. I wanted to beat the ban.

I was going to joke and say your Beat the Ban cost more than 17.00 dollars, hell I bought a Saiga 12 Shotgun overpaid but got it anyway and to 2 RRA AR15s at retail cost due to having a gunsmith relationship. I also bought some fantastic 5.56 ammo and over 2k rounds of practice ammo.

My next purchase will probably be an SKS or AR47. I have read a great deal more about my rights to arm myself and to protect my country from a threat.

Thanks for placing me ahead of the curve and your book only cost me over 2800.00 dollars in guns and ammo. Well lets just say it was a good investment in my family’s future! Best to you and your family and may you continue with success and great health.

-Mike P.
Proud USCCA Member
Proud Member of the NRA
Proud American!

This is a DIGITAL PRODUCT on PDF and MP3, so you get this timely information instantly delivered to your inbox, so you can Beat the Ban ASAP!


== USCCA Members-Only ==
Forum Highlights

Every paying website member has complete access to the USCCA forum, which is constantly being accessed by members sharing information, knowledge, insight, and fun. With well over sixty-thousand posts and growing by the hour, this is one heck of a valuable resource!

If you have never logged in but are a member, visit THIS location to watch help videos, including how to find out your username and/or password!

I Shot Myself Today

A friend came over to my home today to test a new KelTec .380 for concealed carry. I in turn dug out an Ortgies .380 I have to shoot along.

My range is set up with a table at 7 yards for self-defense and another at 25 yds. We were at the 7 yd. table plinking at some bowling pins, flipper targets, some tin TV trays, etc.

I was shooting at a .45 cal rated flipper target with my handgun, and was getting the flipper spinning around when one shot bounced back and grazed my right side about 3 inches above my belt. It left a 1″ long crease and my buddy got a pencil lead sized nick on his neck from the same shot.

That is the second time in two years a shot splashed back at the shooter, but the first time hitting someone. The other near hit was from 25 yards with a 9mm (?). The expended round hit the dirt in front of the firing line.

I think I’ll remove the flipper target and bury it. I have another for .22 exclusively, but that doesn’t spin.
************

Long-term power generation

Generators are good, yes, but I can see that keeping fuel for more than a few days could get problematical (barring installation of storage tanks and proper use of stabilizers). What are some options for at least modest electrical power generation that could work for, say, two weeks or more?
************

Aftermath of discharge

I have a question regarding what your responsibility would be if you actually ever had to fire on someone in self defense. (forgive me if there is another thread on this subject but I wasn’t seeing it). I at least figured you’d have to remain at the scene for the police but what would happen when they get there?

Would you pretty much have to be taken into custody until the situation is sorted out? How would you handle your weapon ie. take mag out, set down etc. Btw keep in mind that Washington state doesn’t require a training course for a ccp so if they teach that I hadn’t heard it, hell all they did was give me a pamphlet on general state gun laws and told me to have a nice day.

I always thought that was awfully simplistic given that this is the left coast.

************


Cruising for a Carry Permit?

“A few years ago,” confesses Craig Brownell, “my wife and I were on a cruise vacation and I saw a bunch of people doing business meetings aboard the ship. I instantly thought, ‘Wow! What a great idea!’ They got a nice vacation and got some work done too.”

Thus the idea of a Cruise with Class was born. Craig, a certified firearms instructor, teaches students what they need to know to be qualified to carry in no less than 33 states. As the ship –Carnival Spirit – cruises the scenic waters of the beautiful Alaskan Inside Passage, Craig offers three short class sessions presenting the concealed-carry basics to his students. He provides all paperwork and helps students get their applications prepared to submit.

The ship docks for one day each in Juneau, Skagway, Ketchikan and Sitka. In Sitka, a brief range session completes the requirements for the firearms classes. Since firearms are not allowed in Canada or aboard the cruise ship, the range provides all necessary equipment including firearms.

Meanwhile, students and their families enjoy the visit to a world where bald eagles are as common as city pigeons, and where seals and whales frolic in the waves alongside towering cliffs and scenic fjords. Participants can trek into Alaska’s historic settlements, or spend a day cruising Prince William Sound and College Fjord or even spend a day aboard a crab fishing boat. Aboard the ship, vacationers awaken to buffet-style breakfasts, linger over lunches on the Lido Deck, and feast on gourmet meals in the dining room. Meals and room service are included in the cost of the cruise. The ship boasts a fitness club, gourmet coffee shop, wine bar, casino, pools, spas, and nightclubs. Two free Vegas-style shows play in the on board theater every evening. For those with children, there’s Camp Carnival, which provides age-appropriate activities for kids from 2 to 17.

Already mentally packing your bags? For specific price information (prices change rapidly as the departure date nears), call The Cruiseman at (800) 889-7683 and mention Cruise with Class. For more information, visit www.mnpistolclass.com online, or phone (651) 649-4878.


== Video of the Week ==

USCCA VIDEO OF THE WEEK

Click here to go to this week’s Armed American Report and see the video of the week.


== “Tim-spiration” of the Week ==

USCCA PHOTO OF THE WEEK

All Photos of the Week are taken from Mr. Oleg Volk’s
website: http://www.a-human-right.com/. It is a
FANTASTIC site. Please check it out!


USCCA QUOTE OF THE WEEK

    Sometimes a good quote will inspire or motivate you. Sometimes, they’ll just put a smile on your face! Here is the quote for this week…

“If you carry a gun, people will call you paranoid. That’s ridiculous. If I have a gun, what in the hell do I have to be paranoid about?”

-Clint Smith

Self Defense Story OF THE WEEK

    Every day, thousands of Armed Americans use their firearms to preserve human life. Let this section of my newsletter serve as a record of this fact!
    ” San Antonio, Texas”

    From the May 27, 2009 San Antonio Express-News:

    An attempted robbery at a North Side pharmacy turned deadly Wednesday morning when the business owner pulled out a gun and shot the suspected robber.

    No other injuries were reported at the incident that happened about 10 a.m. at Babcock Square Pharmacy, located at the intersection of Babcock and Huebner Roads.

    Police Chief William McManus said the suspect handed an employee behind the counter a note that demanded the narcotic drug OxyContin. The chief said the employee was somehow able to alert the pharmacy’s owner, who retrieved his gun and confronted the suspect.

    “The suspect saw his gun, and said, ‘Let’s get it on,’” McManus said.

    The owner, who saw a cocked revolver in the suspect’s hand, pointed his gun at the suspect and shot him point-blank, McManus said. Only the owner, his wife, an employee and the robbery suspect were inside the store at the time of the shooting, according to authorities.

    The chief said no charges would be filed against the owner, who was not immediately identified.

    “He was in fear of his life, so this appears to be justified,” McManus said.


Closing Thoughts

Last week, instead of answering a question, I posted a USCCA Member’s question, and then asked you all to use the ‘ask Tim’ form to give me your thoughts. The question was about whether or not dry-fire practice with a single-action automatic was a good idea, because it could train your subconscious to rack the slide after each shot in a high-stress situation.

I received a TON of amazing replies, but I don’t have very much room here.

In case you’re interested, I have copied as many of these replies to a web-page for you to access. Be warned, though, that I didn’t have time to proof-read or spell check them all.

I’ll post a few here, and then I’ll give you the link to that web-page.

Here is what some of you had to say…

………………………….
………………………….

This is in response to Allen’s dry-fire question. I have the same issue with my Glock. Every one of us can understand the benefits of dry fire practice. I certainly see and can understand where you got into the habit of racking the slide and didn’t even realize it just by creating muscle memory. I see several possible solutions to this.

1. Practice dry-firing with a comparable DA or DAO pistol. By comparable, I mean similar size, weight, and shape, not caliber. Remember, this is not going to necessarily be your carry gun. However, it will give you the opportunity to develop the muscle memory for your real carry gun. You will also have a back-up gun that you are familiar with if you ever feel the need to use it.

2. Don’t bother with the dry-firing practice, but continue to practice drawing and aiming to build and maintain the muscle memory. My practice is drawing and aiming the gun. I don’t dry fire it specifically so that I don’t know when the trigger breaks and the gun fires. Dry firing lets me remember that. In addition, practicing with a DA or DAO gun gets your trigger finger used to the double action pull. I would think this is not something you want to confuse you during a “situation” with a single action only gun like the 1911.

3. You’ll have to check on this, but I think some of the manufacturers of replica training guns make the 1911 that the trigger continually works, and so you don’t have to reset the slide when practicing your dry fire.

4. You may even want to only dry-fire once when you draw and aim. That way you get into the habit of resetting the slide before it goes in the holster (I’m assuming you carry that gun in Condition 1–locked and loaded). You can see what you are doing when you fire. I think the best results from will come from going to the range and just shooting. The bonus is that your gun can get a .22LR conversion. Get that, buy .22 ammo so you can practice cheaper than you cam with .45, but also practice with the .45 ammo. You don’t want to get too used to the feel of .22 ammo if you go this route. There’s really no easy answer to your problem. I think the second option would work best for you, it means you don’t have to buy another gun, or hunt for a trainer that may or may not exist. Keep practicing your draw and aim. -Eric Minneapolis …………………………. ………………………….
In response to your question about dry-firing a SA pistol, I will offer my own opinion and experience. When I became a police officer in ‘75, our agency required us to carry (and purchase our own) revolver. While on patrol duty I carried a Colt Trooper MKIII; I couldn’t afford the Python that has always left me drooling! I carried the Trooper until I went into the detective bureau.

Needing a better concealment weapon, I bought a Ruger Security Six stainless revolver. I carried both these weapons for over 24 years, and like most of the other current/former/retired police officers (as well as many of our USCCA members), I practiced way more than just the required range time for my job, both in dry-firing as well as live shooting. Needless to say, I became very comfortable and confident with my revolvers. As with most agencies, trends change, and we were offered the option of going to automatic pistols. However, there were stipulations: They had to have TWO safes, and we had to keep at least one on AT ALL TIMES!

I smelled problems. The guys (and ultimately girls… I told you trends change!) would chide me about holding on to my ’round guns’. My only response was that if and when I needed to shoot, I was confident it would fire the first time, and I was very good at shooting them (as proven many times at the police range and simulated ’situational’ drills). It’s not that I would not have liked to use a pistol, but I knew what I had, and I trusted them!

As a point of emphasis, shortly after our transition to pistols, our first two shoot-outs seriously justified my stand; the involved officers drew their weapons and fired two-to-three times before they realized their safeties were still on, and they had not fired a single round! When you change types of weapons and go from familiar to not-so-familiar, it’s no big deal - until life and death stress factors in, and you automatically fall back on your old training and habits. Obviously, our policies changed to adjust, and with that we were allowed to carry a variety of ‘Range Officer approved’ makes and types.

Those changes ended the unnecessary risks. Me, I STILL stuck to my revolvers. Ultimately, our local county sheriff ‘merged’ with our department, and it was now mandatory to carry a pistol. Fortunately for me, pistol designs had changed, and I bought a double action 9mm with NO SAFETIES. Great. I now had a ’square gun’ that worked like my round ones! I quickly became familiar with my new weapon, and fired both live rounds and dry-fired the same as I did with my revolvers.

The most important thing was that I also TRUSTED my new weapon, knowing it would shoot the first time, no matter how stressed I was. Good feeling! Now, to more directly answer your question; I still carry a Chief Special Air weight, not because I don’t want a pistol, but only because I’ve carried it for more than thirty years, and I’m very comfortable with it. I do own a full sized Colt Combat Commander, but it’s a SA with two safes. Sound familiar? My fear factor still says go with what’s familiar, but I AM looking to buy a compact .40 cal DOUBLE ACTION pistol in the near future, and scour the USCCA forums and the Concealed Carry Magazine for input.

My point is (finally!), when you diligently ‘practice’, practice becomes second nature. The purpose of practicing is to create a natural reaction to whatever reason you practice for, whether it be competitive aerobatics in a plane, or struggling for your life in a face-to-face shooting situation, so that you automatically do certain things without conscious thought, thus allowing you time to process and react to any additional information.

………………………….
………………………….
Regarding the question about dry firing a SA semi-auto in this weeks Armed American Report. There are two different ways to practice shooting, each with their own pros and cons. I will discuss both sides of each. First off, there is live fire. The good parts of live fire is that you get used to the recoil, get solid feedback on how well you are shooting, and the gun functions exactly like it will if you ever need to use it for self defense.

The downside to live fire is that it can get quite expensive to get enough practice in to get good enough, and you may develop a flinch. Second, there is dry fire. The upside is that you can practice as much as you want without ever having to spend a penny and you are much less likely to develop a flinch. The downside is that you have to manipulate the slide for every shot (causing that extra step in your muscle memory), you do not get the concrete feedback of where exactly your shots fall, and you will not get used to the recoil. Both sides have their benefits and downfalls, so the best solution would be to do a little of both.

Shoot enough that you can get the muscle memory of exactly how to handle your weapon in a fighting situation (this involves not just accuracy, but speed and multiple hits in a short time and on multiple targets). Dry fire enough to develop those good fundamentals of shooting: sight alignment and picture, focus on the front sight, and slow steady trigger squeeze. Something that our Drill Instructors had us do in Boot Camp (Marines) was to take out our charging handle (on the M-16) and replace it with a boot lace. Then another recruit would sit/stand behind you and “fire” the weapon every time that you pulled the trigger.

If you could come up with a way to do that on your 1911, that would probably help your problem. Another thing that I do when dry firing is instead of just racking the slide, I will act like the weapon just misfired, and do the complete remedial action for a misfire (smack the bottom of the magazine, rack the slide, and then fire again - we call it tap-rack-bang in the Corps).
………………………….
…………………………. And, if you’re up for some more interesting reading, here is the location where I’ve deposited most of the rest of the replies:

http://deltamediallc.com/aar/dryfire.html

Do you have a pressing concern? Use the ‘Ask Tim’ contact form found at this page to let me hear your advice. Just use the graphic below!



Be Safe,

Tim Schmidt

Founder - U.S. Concealed Carry
http://www.usconcealedcarry.com

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Add Your Comment (Get a Gravatar)

Get a Gravatar! Your Name

Your email is never shared.

*